NASB got its start back in 2008 when 11 automotive brands (with only two luxury brands) met for a one-day conference in Dallas. Today, NASB has grown to 17 automotive brands, with seven luxury brands, and they set the agenda for two face-to-face meetings a year.
The March meeting was all about how to manage Service Capacity – the tools, the metrics, how and which data we collect (and should collect), and how we can change dealer behavior. Some insights included:
- OEMs agree that there is a need to accurately measure and forecast service capacity.
- If you’re not getting down to the dealer level, you are missing pockets of under-capacity.
- Customer retention is driven by service capacity.
- Lack of service capacity can drive customers to the aftermarket prematurely.
- There’s almost a need to get down to the individual customer level.
- It can be difficult to persuade dealers to invest.
- Business cases and forecasts tailored to specific dealers are critical to getting buy-in for investment.
- Incentive plans can be effective, but beware of dependence.
- Smaller OEMs and luxury brands can be impacted by service capacity constraints very quickly.
- Higher frequency data collection captures variation in service capacity.
- OEMs have experienced success with engaging their service field forces.
- Web-based tools are the future.
- The “expressable” market is likely to stay constant in the near term. Most OEMs either have an Express Service program in place or are planning to launch one in the near future to compete with the IAM.
- Since the last time we discussed this topic, most OEMs got more sophisticated around their reporting structures and are also able to report many success stories: Express Service dealers are outperforming Non-Express Service dealers on most dimensions that are being tracked.
- Challenges are mostly related to sustainment and training – multiple OEMs have started tackling these issues.
- Other highlights included OEM case studies on Express Service Reporting Dashboard and Sustainment Initiatives, Express Service staffing models of the future, and initiatives to improve service capacity.
- Do you regularly share service capacity data with your dealers?
- Have you created business cases for service capacity investment for all dealers?
- How do you use your dealer operating standards to reinforce service capacity requirements?
- Are you incorporating retention and other operational data at a dealer level to allow for capacity forecasting at differentiated retention levels?
- What initiatives do you have in place to engage your Express Service Dealers?
- How are you handling the career expectations of your Express Service team members? Link to Technician Survey Results
So what’s next? At the fall meeting, we will be discussing Second Owner Retention and we’ll come up with industry standards for Express Service Metrics. We are already looking forward to another great, in-depth discussion!
On a related note, we are excited to announce a Focus Day on the Connected Dealership and Service Lane Technology, which will address key topics such as telematics, service scheduling, RO write-up, service marketing, parts planning, and integrated service lane technologies which have been top-of-mind for OEMs, dealers, and 3rd party technology providers. In 2012, Carlisle conducted a consumer-facing technology roundtable at NASB. Last year, we took a deep dive into the topic and published the Market Assessment of Extended Service Technologies Report [LINK]. Our goal for the focus day will be to update and expand on this report: email@example.com or 978.318.0500 ext. 103.