This week is about how Deere really gets it. For next week’s “digital kumite” I will pit Deere vs. Toyota in the build-your-product ring and compare how each respective web site sells accessories. I’ll get to this in a bit, but first some background.
I’ve studied accessories and implements for a few decades. On one hand, you’ve got end-customers who might want them; on the other hand you have end-customers that might not want them. The difference between might and might not can be due to a multitude of factors, spanning invention, subvention, differentiation, retention, and detention.
Have we invented the right accessory? Have we merchandised it well? Have we priced it to meet the market? Can the accessory differentiate the whole good? Is that differentiation enough to retain a fickle/meandering customer or attract a new customer? Does the selling process enhance or detain the sale of the whole good?
Over the years we’ve done a lot of survey work on the accessory market. At the start of the value chain, you have OEM product developers dreaming up, and taking to market, hundreds, if not thousands, of accessories and implements … at each OEM. At the other end of the value chain, customers buy them. From dealers. Several years ago I visited a dealer who represented an OEM with the best accessory development capability in the automotive industry. We talked about how they sold accessories. First off, they made sure that selling accessories did not get in the way of selling the car or truck – they did not want accessories to be a deal breaker. Next, they showed me a 5” x 7” polycarbonate picture frame where they had ten accessories listed, handwritten, to be sold, sometime, during the whole goods sales process. Same ten lines of accessories used for selling a subcompact or a pickup truck. All they wanted to sell was the straight shower rod they were familiar with, but who knows, the OEM accessory developers might have actually had some “curved shower rods” in their accessory portfolios that never made it to the dealer’s short list. Invention. What those developers heard echoing back from the vast distances separating them from the actual market, was that “price” was the reason a lot of the stuff did not sell. Subvention. The stuff did not sell; customers did not differentiate; and needs will not filled; they went elsewhere. Differentiation, retention. The problems were that polycarbonate frame, with its’ handwritten list of the top-10, and the fear that selling accessories would screw up the sale of the whole goods. Detention.
But all this has changed. The thing that the internet does best is disseminate information and it has done that in spades for accessories. Now consumers are no longer dependent on that 5x7 frame in the dealership with the old, boring accessories shown. Now consumers can look at everything (in most cases) that an OEM has to offer for their products. The car-guys invented build-your-own product capabilities on their websites, and Deere has leveraged this concept to break the cycle of pain. If you want to buy their Gator ATV, go to Google and type in “Deere Gator”. Almost every time, a Deere paid ad will sit on top of the list; click the Gator ad-line and it takes you to the Deere website that features the Gator. So far I’ve typed two words and had two mouse clicks. At this point the Gator on the web page automatically assembles and accessorizes – accessories start to fly into the picture and attach themselves to the Gator. I can learn more about the Gator … but, I am lured into building my own Gator. I start with a standard Gator filling up my screen in a woodland stream setting. With one mouse click, I change the background to be a trail. I choose which model I want to start building with mouse clicks. I decide on a diesel version. Next, I can change colors. I’m a purist and stay with Deere green. OK, I’m now ready for accessories. I choose these from sidebar lists that have pictures and costs. I pick with clicks. I can click to get a lot more information on the accessory, or simply choose it. Once I choose it, it magically assembles on my Gator that’s sitting in the middle of my screen. The list price updates and I see where I am. I can stop the process at any time, click on “View Summary”, save or print my build list, email it to myself, and/or ask for a dealer quote on my accessorized Gator. My Gator. It only took me a few minutes to go from an $11,199 base Gator to a fully accessorized one at $18,777. This is incredibly impressive. I know there are others out there that have similar functionality, but Deere does this very well. We know that one-third of all service customers research on the web and are “digital service customers.” The proportion of whole goods sales customers that use the web must be a lot higher – they are “digital sales customers”. ‘Build your own’ capabilities have been around for a long time, but they mostly focus on standard factory option “lists” where you can only change the color of the vehicle being built. The Deere Gator site allows you to graphically build your product and choose from standard factory options, attachments, and accessories. It is profoundly different. It solves the accessory riddle spanning invention, subvention, differentiation, retention, and detention.
Bottom Line: Deere hits on all the “tions” and deserves to be seen as a very relevant benchmark by OEMs in all motor vehicle sectors.
- Invention. Deere directly connects their accessory and implement inventors to all digital end-customers. They can see from the clicks and builds if there is a market for their attachments and accessories. The Deere Gator site is the equivalent of a gigantic video product clinic. The graphics are spectacular enough to give it statistical clinic relevancy. The data from this must be mind-bending. My guess is that the cost of developing this sort of interactive visual build would be more than offset by reducing product development misfires and clinic costs.
- Subvention. Rather than have dealers filter back pricing issues (that might be irrelevant and misleading) the build “clinic” tests pricing on customers who build Gators on the Deere website. If something is not chosen for any/many builds, it’s either the product or the price. The price is easy to vary and determine pricing elasticities.
- Differentiation & Retention. The key to differentiation is market awareness. If you develop 1,000 accessories and only ten show up inside the polycarbonate frame, well, you ain’t got much product awareness. If your website builds from tiny pictures and lists, and your choices don’t show up on that vehicle in the middle of the screen, well, you ain’t got much product awareness. If, when you build, you can only choose from a very short list of what’s possible, well, you ain’t got much product awareness. Deere solves this riddle with complex and comprehensive Pixar-like simulations of what the customer is building. It is brilliant.
- Detention. There is nothing you can do to get dealers to overcome their fear that selling accessories will detain and screw up the whole goods sales process. Rather than depending on the dealer for the connection, Deere leapfrogs the dealer and configures the exact product with the end-customer. The build is sent to the dealer or printed out. The sales discussion starts with the build and works down or sideways, rather than starting with a stripped product and working up, or simply staying pat. Detention for Deere’s digital Gator customers is irrelevant.